WORLD
BUSINESS
SPORTS
TECHNOLOGY
社会
政治
国際
経済
テクノロジー
スポーツ
エンターテイメント
科学
twitter hashtag summary
twitter trend
speech separation
large number Retweet
talking summarization
alarming description
real time translation turndown translation
|
|
|
Obamacareがダウン状態になれば計画GOPのヘルスケアの代わりはそれと、中産階級合っている!
earlier today , the supreme court began to listen to six hours of oral arguments spread over three days in what may turn out to be the most important case it has overseen in decades.
. .
in the seventh (sevenff!) hour on the third (thffd!) day's of supreme court oral argument over the patient prometection and affordable care act , when just about everyone seemed mentally and physically worn out , there was a moment t it was a moment that captured the competing worldviews at stake in this titanic legal battle .
第7 (sevenff!) 第3の時間(thffd!) によってこの巨大な法廷闘争で危機に瀕した競争のworldviewsを捕獲したのは時だった時tがあったちょうど皆についておよび物理的に身に着けられている精神的にようである時、忍耐強い保護および現実的な心配の行為上の最高裁判所の口頭議論の日。
“can you create commerce in order to regulate it?”
. .
as everyone knows , from march 26 to march 28 , the supreme court will hear oral argument in one of the most important cases to come before the court in our lifetimes: florida v t hhs , the case that will determine the constitutionality of the patient protection and affordable care act t lest you think i’m exaggerating , the high court has assigned six hours , over three days , to hearing arguments in the case: something it hasn’t done in 45 years t in this article , i’ll preview the key aspects of the case , and what to look for in the courtroom .
. .
earlier today , the supreme court began to listen to six hours of oral arguments spread over three days in what may turn out to be the most important case it has overseen in decades.
. .
last week’s u.s t kennews was dominated by the oral arguments before the supreme court of the united states (scotus) on the constitutionality of the patient protection and affordable care act (ppaca) , also known more succinctly as the affordable care act (aca) , or , simply , “obamacare.”
. .
as everyone knows , from march 26 to march 28 , the supreme court will hear oral argument in one of the most important cases to come before the court in our lifetimes: florida v t hhs , the case that will determine the constitutionality of the patient protection and affordable care act t lest you think i’m exaggerating , the high court has assigned six hours , over three days , to hearing arguments in the case: something it hasn’t done in 45 years t in this article , i’ll preview the kennedy aspects of the case , and what to look for in the courtroom .
. .
when the affordable care act came into effect in 2010 , few cast doubt on its validity.
. .
oral arguments in the supreme court case about the constitutionality of the patient prometection and affordable care act are over , and liberals are very nervous t we won’t know the court’s reguling until june , but the justices asked lots of skeptical questions and it seems like a distinct possibility that part or all of the law will be struck down .
. .
in the seventh (sevenff!) hour on the third (thffd!) day's of supreme court oral argument over the patient prometection and affordable care act , when just about everyone seemed mentally and physically worn out , there was a moment t it was a moment that captured the competing worldviews at stake in this titanic legal battle .
“can you create commerce in order to regulate it?”
whichiever way the supreme court rules as to the constitutionality of the patient prometection and affordable care act , those who opposed the act will continue to be asked , “with what would you replace it?”
congressional republicans are beginning to face up to the reality that , should the supreme court wipe out the affordable care act ,
Generated 2012-4-24_17:19
|
|
|
|
|
