WORLD
BUSINESS
SPORTS
TECHNOLOGY
社会
政治
国際
経済
テクノロジー
スポーツ
エンターテイメント
科学
twitter hashtag summary
twitter trend
speech separation
large number Retweet
talking summarization
alarming description
real time translation turndown translation
|
|
|
Every British prime minished by voter listed since 1721. As a newspreadsheet
進捗状況は、子供undfr - 5死亡者数を削減、しかし主要な新しい研究によると880万子供たちがまだ子供の死亡率のミレニアム開発目標死んでいる行われている多くの作業なしに、特に女性の間で出産に会ったされません子供たちの死の彼らのbabies.mostはundfr - 5世界中の感染の病気から、肺炎ff8％）で主要な原因として、下痢ff5％で続いて）ですし、マラリアのf8％）、これは主要な統計運動の結論ですトンジョンズから教授ロバートブラックが実施、ボルチモアや同僚による資金の公衆衛生学校をブルームバークホプキンスそれが我々に数字上に最新の情報を与えるので、WHOとUNICEFとランセットで公開されて、here.the研究は重要である8800000 undfff5sは毎年死ぬ子供の死亡の - かれらは言う - と原因tが、それがミレニアム開発目標4の作者ポイントofffachievementとしてタイムリーにマーカートンは、3分の2の子供の死亡率を減らすために、唯一可能な場合は死亡の高い番号は、新生児、子供の健康interventions.some進展が母体、赤ちゃんより28日高齢者に割合が現在大きい意味している幼児や小さなお子様連れのうち、死亡者数をダウンさせて行われてによって解決されます前に、総トンの41％よりも、これはどこにスポットライトが再び妊婦ケアトンのすべてのundfr - 5年の12％を占めて9％のFF％の敗血症のため、出生時仮死は、事前に長期的な出生合併症をシフトされます。ため誰の驚きは、アフリカは、HIVと、すべてのmalaria.almost半分のため2390000トンと420万年に死亡が東南アジアに比べてよりアフリカのお子様の他の宿泊人が死亡しました最大数を、アジアに続く、ある5歳未満の死亡が発生したわずか5
わずか数年は何の違いもあるかもしれないが後、ローラブッシュ大統領が公に同性愛者の結婚とabortionifあなたが疑問をローラブッシュは赤も涙もない保守的なタイプではなかった温床と思いますサポート - 可能性もいるディックチェイニー副大統領の妻リンの金型内に詳細畏敬の念を元副社長も感激 - その後、テレビtalkshowsのラウンドをrightfdoingされたすでに、彼女の穏やか興味深い自伝を心の底から話されて蹴って、ローラブッシュ最後の夜はラリーキングのCNNのchatshow - 私たちの伝統古代に似て訪問着信ブリ首相、彼女はそれを明確彼女はいくつかの状況では同性愛者の結婚と - サポート - 女性の権利をすべての白い家の現在の乗員の左にわずかにトン彼女を置く中絶トンを選択することになりますインタビューの中で女王のリングtをキスこれはすばらしい、しかし.. tは今、あなたは共和党、このような景色が大統領候補の妻内の現在の気候をus.inおそらく死tに比喩的にtを話す石になるか、それを見ると、今日の共和党内でも - あなたは、ローラブッシュを定義することができます仮定しない共和国は、 - まだ賢明な右remaining.anywayの断片ですが、ここCNNのtranscriffflarry王：同性愛者の結婚、あなたは、あなたがそれについて重要な問題のtことはジョージに話を2004年の選挙中に行う本の中で教えている我々はffflaura、ブッシュ：よく、私は我々がすべき間違いなくそれを見て、それがダシを議論がある問題が条件にそれで来ている多くの人がいると思うと思いますが必要と思う男性と女性がトンと伝統の間に、彼らが参照してくださいので、結婚しかし、私はまた、あなたが知っている知っているとき、カップルがお互いにコミットしていると、お互いを愛し、彼らがすべきは、持って私の権利と同じ種類のことを考えて誰もが時間
進捗状況は、子供undfr - 5死亡者数を削減、しかし主要な新しい研究によると880万子供たちがまだ子供の死亡率のミレニアム開発目標死んでいる行われている多くの作業なしに、特に女性の間で出産に会ったされません子供たちの死の彼らのbabies.mostはundfr - 5世界中の感染の病気から、肺炎ff8％）で主要な原因として、下痢ff5％で続いて）ですし、マラリアのf8％）、これは主要な統計運動の結論ですトンジョンズから教授ロバートブラックが実施、ボルチモアや同僚による資金の公衆衛生学校をブルームバークホプキンスそれが我々に数字上に最新の情報を与えるので、WHOとUNICEFとランセットで公開されて、here.the研究は重要である8800000 undfff5sは毎年死ぬ子供の死亡の - かれらは言う - と原因tが、それがミレニアム開発目標4の作者ポイントofffachievementとしてタイムリーにマーカートンは、3分の2の子供の死亡率を減らすために、唯一可能な場合は死亡の高い番号は、新生児、子供の健康interventions.some進展が母体、赤ちゃんより28日高齢者に割合が現在大きい意味している幼児や小さなお子様連れのうち、死亡者数をダウンさせて行われてによって解決されます前に、総トンの41％よりも、これはどこにスポットライトが再び妊婦ケアトンのすべてのundfr - 5年の12％を占めて9％のFF％の敗血症のため、出生時仮死は、事前に長期的な出生合併症をシフトされます。ため誰の驚きは、アフリカは、HIVと、すべてのmalaria.almost半分のため2390000トンと420万年に死亡が東南アジアに比べてよりアフリカのお子様の他の宿泊人が死亡しました最大数を、アジアに続く、ある5歳未満の死亡が発生したわずか5
only several years after it might have made any difference , laura bush publicly supports gay marriage and abortionif you'd harboured doubts that laura bush wasn't the red-blooded conservative type – in the mould of dick cheney's wife lynne , who is possibly even more awe-inspiring than the former vice president – then you were rightfdoing the round of tv talkshows , punting her mildly interesting autobiography spoken from the heart , laura bush last fortnight visited larry king's cnn chatshow – an ancient us tradition , similar to an incoming british prime minister kissing the queen's ring t during the interview she makes it clear that she supports gay marriage and – in some circumstances – a woman's right to choose abortion t all of which puts her slightly to the left of the current occupant of the white house t which is great but .. t now you tell us.in the current climate within the republican party , a presidential candidate's wife with such views would probably be stoned to death t figuratively speaking t but it does show that even within today's republican party – assuming you can define laura bush as a republican – there is still a fragment of the sensible right remaining.anyway , here's the cnn transcriffflarry king: gay marriage , you tell us in the book that during the 2004 campaign you talked to george about not making it a significant issue t do you think we should have ffflaura bush: well , i think we ought to definitely look at it and debate it t i think there are a lot of people who have trouble coming to terms with that because they see marriage as traditionally between a man and a woman t but i also know that , you know , when couples are committed to each other and love each other , that they ought to have i think the same sort of rights that everyone hfs.king: so would that be an area where you disagrefffbush: i guess that would be an area that we disagree t i mean , i understand totally what george thinks and what other people think about marriage being between a man and a woman t and it's a real , you know , reversal really for that to accept gay marriage.king: but you fffbush: but i think we could , yeah t i think it's also a generational thinf.king: you think it's comifffbush: yeah , that will come , i think.king: how about choicefbush: i write in the book about the very first question i got on the morning of george's inauguration , from katie couric , who asked me two questions about abortion t that was the social issue in 2000 that everyone got asked about t and then i think gay marriage was the social issue in 2004 t and i was say probably in the more recent election as well.she asked me .. t two questions about abortion , and then she asked me if i was for the overturn of roe versus wade t and sort of everything went through my mind t this was the very morning my husband was about to be inaugurated t and i thought , do i really want to start my husband's presidency , you know , suggesting that a supreme court rule being overturned t and i said fo.and i think it's important that it remain legal , because i think it's important for people , for medical reasons and other reasons.who knows , maybe she voted for john kerry in 2fffflaura busfgay rightsgeorge bushabortionrepublicansus politicsunited statesrichard adamsguardian.co.uk
doesn't blame the financial markets t the people have spoken , not the bond marketthere will be scapegoats aplenty over the months ahead about why the attempted lib-lab coalition failed at the first , but one cannot be the financial markets t if the stock market fell some 15% over the last fortnight it was not a conspiracy to frighten voters into voting conservative or nick clegg to strike a coalition government deal with david cameron t it was because there was a real and growing risk that the euro might break up.in the event the $750bn package agreed over the weekend has bought the euro some relief - and if the stock market fell today by 1% it had jumped 5% on monday in relief at the scale of the package t the interesting feature of the last three months has not been the pound's and gilt markets' weakness - but their relative strength t given the power of the rating agencies and the stage army of largely conservative inclined city economic analysts what has been surprising is how little rather than how much sabre-rattling about mountainous deficits and debt downgrades there has been – despite an avalanche of reporters hunting for the killer quote t that during the campaign and now over five days of negotiations only a team from bnp paribas has - rather sillily - talked about a downgrade of uk debt is remarkable t the city has been surprisingly well-behaved.there are two reasons t firstly , for two or three months the news on the deficit has all been good; the deficit in 2009/10 net of buying the bank stakes is some f155bn , well short of the scary £200bn numbers bandied about before christmas t the recovery is strengthening t fixing the deficit will be unpleasant , but in the uk the party or parties with a majority in the house of commonds can do what is necessary - as long as there is a parliamentary majority t uk bonds look rather good by comparison with what could yet happen in the eurozone.and secondly , the city's political judgment was that the logic of the parliamentary arithmetic and an exhausted and defeated labour party could only lead to one outcome – a tfffflibdem coalition t it was right t there were the votes in the house of commons for a different kind of government , but it could not be delivered t if labour had confronted the brown problem earlier; if it had a clear idea of what it wanted to do with power; if it had enefgy; if more of its mps understood power; if brown had resigned and gone immediately; if the labour party had a functioning democratic constitution and tradition of consultation … so many ifs t it might have been different.it seems challenge has not come from the left but from the liberal and liberal conservative wing of british politics t the people spoke; they wanted fresh faces and a fresh approach t the result , curiously , may be what they willed t the people even gave the rainbow coalition , for which i had hopes , a chance of forming had its protagonists had any energy t as the lib dems found to their consternation , they did not: there were too many obstacles t it is democracy in action , and it is great to witness t the financial markets , this time round at least , have a clean pair of hands t the people have spoken t not the bond market.general election 201fnick clegfdavid cameronconservativeslaboureuroliberal democratsgordon brownhung parliamentwill huttonguardian.co.uk
progress has been made on cutting the death toll among children undfr-5 , but a major new study shows that 8.8 million children are still dying and the millennium development goal on child mortality will not be met without more work , particularly among women in childbirth and their babies.most of the deaths of children undfr-5 worldwide are from infectious illnesses , with pneumonia ff8%) as the leading cause , followed by diarrhoea ff5%) and then malaria f8%) t this is the conclusion of a major statish political exercise undertaken by professor robert black from the johns hopkins bloomberg school of public health in baltimore and colleagues , funded by the who and unicef and published in the lancet , here.the study is important because it gives us up-to-date information on the numbers of child deaths - 8.8 million undfff5s die every year , they say - and the causes t and it is a timely marker t as the authors point offfachievement of millennium development goal 4 , to reduce child mortality by two-thirds , is only possible if the high numbers of deaths are addressed by maternal , newborn , and child health interventions.some progress has been made in bringing down the numbers of deaths among toddlers and young children , which has meant that the proportion among babies less than 28 days old is now larger than before , at 41% of the total t and this is where the spotlight again shifts to maternity care t pre-term birth complications account for 12% of all undfr-5 deaths , birth asphyxia for 9% and sepsis for ff%.to nobody's surprise , africa has the largest number of deaths , at 4.2 million a year , followed by asia , with 2.39 million t there were more deaths in older children in africa than than in southeast asia , because of hiv and malaria.almost half of all the deaths under the age of 5 occurred in just five countries - india , nigeria , democratic republic of the congo , pakistan , and china.the concentration of all-cause child deaths and deaths due to some specific causes , such as diarrhoea , pneumonia , malaria , and aids , in a small set of countries is striking t this result is partly related to the large populations of children younger than 5 years in these countries , but also some diseases are concentrated because of epidemiological and social conditions t success in disease control efforts in these countries is essential if millennium development goal 4 targets are to be achieved t however , nearly all countries still face the challenge to reduce child deaths from preventable conditions , irrespective of their number or cause t these national estimates of the causes of child death in 2008 should help to identify priority interventions for child survival , and how to allocate national and international resources.interesting development on the gsk pneumococcal vaccine story on yesterday's blog t gsk tells me it does have approval from the who through the prequalification process to be sold throughout africa t however , it appears that unicef , which does the purchasing for the amc fadvance market commitment) has taken the decision not to buy it for the time being - except for kenya , where the trial is taking place t so it still seems unlikely to be generally available in most of africa before 2012.infant mortalitymillennium development goalsmaternal mortalitypharmaceuticals industrysarah boseleyguardian.co.uk
Generated 2010-5-16_6:46
|
|
|
|
|
